Role Erosion - Revision history

Admin at 06:54, 4 April 2014

2014-04-04T06:54:22Z

Admin at 06:28, 4 April 2014

2014-04-04T06:28:37Z

Admin at 20:12, 2 April 2014

2014-04-02T20:12:37Z

Admin at 20:10, 2 April 2014

2014-04-02T20:10:19Z

Admin: Created page with "Role Erosion is a term used to describe circumstances where a power exchange relationship gradually and unintentionally takes on a more vanilla outlook, focusing l..."

2014-04-02T20:09:56Z

Created page with "Role Erosion is a term used to describe circumstances where a power exchange relationship gradually and unintentionally takes on a more vanilla outlook, focusing l..."

New page

Role Erosion is a term used to describe circumstances where a [[power exchange]] [[relationship]] gradually and unintentionally takes on a more [[vanilla]] outlook, focusing less on the [[D/s] aspects.

== Causes ==

This decrease in active D/s is most often caused by a degrading power structure and lack of desire to follow and enforce protocols. Much like the [[four pillars]] a D/s relationship requires constant reinforcing of the structure in place in order to remain healthy and functional.

In many cases when mundane details of life become problematic a [[d-type]] will not wish to be bothered with reinforcing power structure, or an [[s-type]] will not wish to follow a power structure set into place.

== Problems ==

A lack of reinforced structure will degrade a relationship over time. In some cases both partners may decide this is a good thing and move away from certain structures that no longer serve them and that is simply an evolution. In other cases the degrading structure will lead to lack of relationship health for one or both partners, causing undesirable conflict and challenge.

== Solutions ==

If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change. If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied. In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.

[[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange]][[Category:Status Roles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 4 April 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change. If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied, potentially ending the relationship. In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.		If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change. If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied, potentially ending the relationship. In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.

−	[[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange~~]][[Category:Identities~~]]	+	[[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:28, 4 April 2014
Line 15:		Line 15:
	If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change. If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied, potentially ending the relationship. In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.		If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change. If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied, potentially ending the relationship. In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.

−	[[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange]][[Category:~~Status Roles~~]]	+	[[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange]][[Category:Identities]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:10, 2 April 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Role Erosion is a term used to describe circumstances where a [[power exchange]] [[relationship]] gradually and unintentionally takes on a more [[vanilla]] outlook, focusing less on the [[D/s] aspects.	+	Role Erosion is a term used to describe circumstances where a [[power exchange]] [[relationship]] gradually and unintentionally takes on a more [[vanilla]] outlook, focusing less on the [[D/s]] aspects.

	== Causes ==		== Causes ==

@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 == Solutions ==
-If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change.  If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied.  In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.
+If both partners are happy with the relationship evolution there is no reason to resist the change.  If both partners are unhappy with the lack of structure, in most cases this means both must put in more effort to reinforce the current power structures or become increasingly dissatisfied, potentially ending the relationship.  In the case one partner is unsatisfied while the new partner is happy with the evolution it may be time to revisit negotiations.
 [[Category:Relationships]][[Category:Power Exchange]][[Category:Status Roles]]