Category:Relationships - Revision history

Admin: /* No Implied Power Exchange Relationships */

2015-01-07T00:03:37Z

‎No Implied Power Exchange Relationships

2014-07-23T08:44:09Z

‎Power Exchange Relationships

2014-07-23T08:42:58Z

‎Power Exchange Relationships

2014-04-05T18:13:20Z

‎Power Exchange Relationships

2014-04-05T18:13:05Z

‎Future Articles

2014-04-05T18:12:24Z

‎Power Exchange

2014-04-05T18:10:10Z

2014-04-04T07:26:03Z

2014-04-04T06:09:48Z

2014-04-04T05:56:21Z

@@ Line 16: / Line 16: @@
 *In an open relationship
 *It's complicated
 *Lovers
 *Married

@@ Line 38: / Line 38: @@
 *Handler/pet
 *In service to
 *Owner/Property
 *Pack

@@ Line 33: / Line 33: @@
 === Power Exchange Relationships ===
-*24/7
-*Caregiver/little
-*Collared
-*Cuckold
-*Big/little
 *Deity/priest(ess)
 *God(dess)/worshiper
 *Handler/pet
 *In service to
-*Master/slave
-*Member of house
 *Owner/Property
 *Pack

@@ Line 62: / Line 62: @@
 *Under Protection
 *Taken in Hand
-*1950's Style Relationship
+*1950's Standard Relationship
 [[Category:Identities]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]

@@ Line 61: / Line 61: @@
 *Under Consideration
 *Under Protection
 [[Category:Identities]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 == Power Exchange ==
-Relationship styles are broken up into no implied power exchange relationships and [[power exchange]] relationships.
+Relationship styles in BDSM are frequently broken up into non-binary relationships and [[power exchange]] relationships.
-While it is acceptable to assume that in any given interaction there is some form of power exchange, the non-power exchange relationships do not necessarily require a conscious transfer of power or authority in order to exist (even though they may/might possess conscious exchange of power), while the power exchange relationships tend to function with this is a key part of the roles of the relationship in some capacity.  In many cases relationships may follow one, none, or many of these templates.
+While it is acceptable to assume that in any given interaction there is some form of power exchange, the non-binary relationships do not necessarily require a conscious transfer of power or authority in order to exist (even though they may/might possess conscious exchange of power), while the power exchange relationships tend to function with this is a key part of the roles of the relationship in some capacity.  In many cases relationships may follow one, none, or many of the listed templates.
 == Future Articles ==

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Relationship styles are broken up into no implied power exchange relationships and [[power exchange]] relationships.
-While it is acceptable to assume that in any given interaction there is some form of power exchange, the non-power exchange relationships do not necessarily require a conscious transfer of power or authority in order to exist (even though they may possess conscious exchange of power), while the power exchange relationships tend to function with this is a key part of the roles of the relationship in some capacity.  In many cases relationships may follow one, none, or many of these templates.
+While it is acceptable to assume that in any given interaction there is some form of power exchange, the non-power exchange relationships do not necessarily require a conscious transfer of power or authority in order to exist (even though they may/might possess conscious exchange of power), while the power exchange relationships tend to function with this is a key part of the roles of the relationship in some capacity.  In many cases relationships may follow one, none, or many of these templates.
-== No Implied Power Exchange Relationships ==
+=== No Implied Power Exchange Relationships ===
 *Brother/sister
@@ Line 25: / Line 31: @@
 *Widow
-== Power Exchange Relationships ==
+=== Power Exchange Relationships ===
 *24/7

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:26, 4 April 2014
Line 56:		Line 56:
	*Under Protection		*Under Protection

−	~~[[Category:BDSM Theory]]~~[[Category:Identities]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]	+	[[Category:Identities]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:09, 4 April 2014
Line 56:		Line 56:
	*Under Protection		*Under Protection

−	[[Category:BDSM Theory]][[Category:~~Status Roles~~]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]	+	[[Category:BDSM Theory]][[Category:Identities]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:56, 4 April 2014
Line 56:		Line 56:
	*Under Protection		*Under Protection

−	~~[[Category:Primer]]~~[[Category:BDSM Theory]][[Category:Status Roles]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]	+	[[Category:BDSM Theory]][[Category:Status Roles]][[Category:D-Types]][[Category:S-types]][[Category:Non-Binary Status Roles]]