By whom - Revision history

Admin: Protected "By whom" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2014-03-26T17:28:10Z

Protected "By whom" ([Edit=Allow only administrators] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only administrators] (indefinite))

2014-03-26T17:22:02Z

2014-03-26T17:21:44Z

Protected "By whom" ([Edit=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite) [Move=Allow only autoconfirmed users] (indefinite))

2014-03-26T17:21:27Z

Replaced content with "Do not Use this template, add a citation instead. --~~~~"

2014-03-26T17:18:58Z

Reverted edits by 46.30.40.94 (talk) to last revision by 46.23.68.179

2014-03-26T17:00:43Z

2014-03-26T17:00:24Z

2014-03-26T16:59:29Z

2014-03-26T16:57:13Z

2014-03-20T00:06:12Z

fix grammar error

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:22, 26 March 2014
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Do not Use this template, add a citation instead. --[[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]]) 17:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)	+	Do not Use this template, add a citation instead or an alternate view and citation on the talk page. --[[User:Admin\|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin\|talk]]) 17:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-This template indicates that a claim has been made without attributing it to anyone. Problematic language includes:
+Do not Use this template, add a citation instead. --[[User:Admin|Admin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 17:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
-−
-: It has been said... {{by whom}}
-−
-: Such-and-such has been criticized ... {{by whom}}
-−
-: BDSM practitioners agree ... {{by whom}}
-−
-The template doesn't mean that the claim is false. It just means that "weasel words" are being used to suggest authority, without actually specifying ''whose'' authority.
-−
-For example, anyone could edit a page and make a claim such as above. But without backing it up with a reference, the wiki would soon become full of these unsubstantiated claims.
-−
-Finally, the phrasing above often leads to passive voice sentences, '''which are considered bad writing'''. (see what I did there?) For example:
-−
-: It has been claimed that ... {{by whom}}

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This template indicates that a claim has been made without attributing it to anyone. Problematic language includes:
-: It haas been said... {{by whom}}
+: It has been said... {{by whom}}
-−
 : Such-and-such has been criticized ... {{by whom}}
 : BDSM practitioners agree ... {{by whom}}
-The template daoesn't mean that the claim is false. It just means that "weasel words" are being used to suggest authority, without actually specifying ''whose'' authority.
+The template doesn't mean that the claim is false. It just means that "weasel words" are being used to suggest authority, without actually specifying ''whose'' authority.
 For example, anyone could edit a page and make a claim such as above. But without backing it up with a reference, the wiki would soon become full of these unsubstantiated claims.
@@ Line 13: / Line 13: @@
 Finally, the phrasing above often leads to passive voice sentences, '''which are considered bad writing'''. (see what I did there?) For example:
-: It has baeen claimed that ... {{by whom}}
+: It has been claimed that ... {{by whom}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 26 March 2014
Line 2:		Line 2:

	: It haas been said... {{by whom}}		: It haas been said... {{by whom}}
−		+	a
	: Such-and-such has been criticized ... {{by whom}}		: Such-and-such has been criticized ... {{by whom}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:00, 26 March 2014
Line 13:		Line 13:
	Finally, the phrasing above often leads to passive voice sentences, '''which are considered bad writing'''. (see what I did there?) For example:		Finally, the phrasing above often leads to passive voice sentences, '''which are considered bad writing'''. (see what I did there?) For example:

−	: It has ~~been~~ claimed that ... {{by whom}}	+	: It has baeen claimed that ... {{by whom}}

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:28, 26 March 2014
(No difference)

← Older revision	Revision as of 17:21, 26 March 2014
(No difference)